Investment and other financial matters

Archive for July, 2010

An introduction to Investment Management

At this stage in time the individual investor would be well advised to
ask a few questions to gain a better understanding of Investment.

The questions to be answered first are:

* What is investment?
* What is investment management?  and
* Where does the money come from?

For a more detailed understanding of this concept; visit:

http://www.narachinvestment.com/introduction.htm

(You may click on the link above or type the complete URL address into
your browser)

.
posted by admin in Uncategorized and have No Comments

Re: How is the AGW scam going to be dismantled?

"Roger Coppock" <rcopp…@adnc.com> wrote in message

news:f5ee82aa-f3b5-42ea-b45a-e38ea62e14e1@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com…
On Jan 2, 4:26 am, matt_sykes <zzeb…@hotmail.com> wrote:
> [ . . . ] when it [Global Warming] becomes aparent that it is a scam
> [ . . . ]

Dream your little fossil fool dreams.  The rest
of us must live in the real world.  By the way,
which one of the conspirators warmed the planet
for the last half-century, and how exactly did
they do that?

**********************

The warming is illusory once urban heat island effect is accounted for!
Here is an example of blatant fudging with the temperature data!

One of the conspirators was P D Jones as shown below.
There are too many other conspirators to mention here!

How the urban heat island effect was ignored by Jones!
http://nzclimatescience.net/images/PDFs/unsoundscience3.pdf

The unrepresentative meteorological temperatures are measured in places
of increasing population, more buildings, more concrete, growing
vegetation, more
cars, more heating. They are subject to urban heating. The evidence that
this is happening is overwhelming. It is the only authentic
"anthropogenic" effect on the climate (Gray 2000)..

The IPCC have tried hard to find some evidence to show this is not so.
The example most quoted is P D Jones et al (1991), who examined an
"extensive" set of
rural -station temperature data for three regions of the world; European
parts of the Soviet Union, Western Australia and Eastern China. When
combined with similar analyses for the contiguous United Sates, the
results are representative of 20% of the land area of the Northern
Hemisphere and 10% of the Southern Hemisphere

They worked out the linear slope of temperature anomalies for the rural
series in each case and compared it with the same slope for several
gridded series. For the Western USSR, this was 1901-1987, and 1930-1987,
for Eastern Australia it was 1930-1988 compared with 1930-1997, for
Eastern China it was 1954-1983, and for the contiguous United States it
was 1901-1984 The differences were only significant at the 5% level for
Eastern Australia and one set of Eastern China

They concluded "It is unlikely that the remaining unsampled areas of the
developing countries in tropical climates, or other highly populated
parts of Europe, could significantly increase the overall urban bias
above 0.05ºC during the twentieth century"

Although Jones et al. in subsequent publications (Brohan et al. 2006)
have sometimes indicated that they apply this correction to their global
series, it is unclear whether they have done so in the more recent
publications.

There are several things wrong with this paper.

* The quality of the data is even worse than usual, as they admit " It
is unfortunate that separate maximum and minimum temperature data are
not more widely available"

* The qualification for a "rural" site is a population below 10,000 for
Western Soviet Union, below 35,000 for Eastern Australia, and below
100,000 for Eastern China. There is ample evidence (in my paper above to
start with) that urban effects exist in such places.

* They have chosen countries with a continuous record of effective
scientific supervision. They are not representative of the rest of the
world, where changes of country and adequate supervision are far less
common

*Even these countries raise doubts. Russia had a tyrannical regime where
statistics were frequently manipulated for political, purposes. China
had a major famine
from the "Great Leap Forward", and also a manipulation of statistics.

*Two of the countries, the contiguous USA and China have such reliable
records that, when corrected, they show no global warming, or residual
urban influence. The United States cannot be regarded as "typical" of
the world.

In the very same year that this paper appeared, 1990, there appeared in
Geophysical Research Letters the following paper, which included two of
the authors of the previous paper, (Wang et al 1991).

The abstract reads as follows "We used 1954-1983 surface temperature
from 42 Chinese urban (average population 1.7 million) and rural
(average population 150,000), station pairs to study the urban heat
island effects. Despite the fact that the rural stations are not true
rural stations, the magnitude of the heat islands was calculated to
average 0.23ºC over the thirty year period, with a minimum value
(0.19ºC) during the 1964-1973 decade and maximum (0.28ºC) during the
most recent decades"

This study by two authors of the previous paper, appears to have used
the same stations that were claimed to have no urban bias in the first
paper, and now there is an urban bias even if "rural" now includes
places with population as high as 150,000.

The early paper (Jones et al 1991), states, of Eastern China "The
stations were selected on the basis of station history: we chose those
with few. if any, changes in instrumentation, location or observation
times"

Wang et al 1991 says "They were chosen based on station histories, we
chose those with few, if any, changes in instrumentation, location, or
observation times"

It’s as if both papers were written at the same time and different
conclusions made from the same data.

Recently Keenan (2007) has shown that many of the Chinese stations moved
several times over the period in question, in one case 15 km.

Get The TRUE Facts At
 http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/index.html

Excellent Links At
 http://www.warwickhughes.com/

Regards
Bonzo

"If the atmosphere was a 100 story building, our annual anthropogenic
CO2
contribution today would be equivalent to the linoleum on the first
floor"
D’Aleo

"…and I think future generations are not going to blame us for
anything except for being silly, for letting a few tenths of a degree
panic us"
Dr. Richard Lindzen, Professor of Meteorology MIT and Member of the
National Academy of Sciences

"What most commentators-and many scientists-seem to miss is that the
only thing we can say with certainly about climate is that it changes"
Dr. Richard Lindzen

[most of the current alarm over climate change is based on] "inherently
untrustworthy climate models, similar to those that cannot accurately
forecast the weather a week from now." Dr. Richard Lindzen

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comment (1)

Global Cooling: Snow Flurries Possible In Central Florida During Hard Freeze

Daytona Beach, Titusville, Palm Bay May See Snow

POSTED: 6:40 am EST January 2, 2008
UPDATED: 6:25 pm EST January 2, 2008

ORLANDO, Fla. — A hard freeze expected in parts of Central Florida
early Thursday will bring a chance of snow flurries in Daytona Beach and
other areas as temperatures drop into the teens and low 20s.

http://www.local6.com/weather/14959516/detail.html

Get The TRUE Facts At
 http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/index.html

Excellent Links At
 http://www.warwickhughes.com/

Regards
Bonzo

"If the atmosphere was a 100 story building, our annual anthropogenic
CO2
contribution today would be equivalent to the linoleum on the first
floor"
D’Aleo

"…and I think future generations are not going to blame us for
anything except for being silly, for letting a few tenths of a degree
panic us"
Dr. Richard Lindzen, Professor of Meteorology MIT and Member of the
National Academy of Sciences

"What most commentators-and many scientists-seem to miss is that the
only thing we can say with certainly about climate is that it changes"
Dr. Richard Lindzen

[most of the current alarm over climate change is based on] "inherently
untrustworthy climate models, similar to those that cannot accurately
forecast the weather a week from now." Dr. Richard Lindzen

 

storytools_newsvine.gif
< 1K
Download

 

storytools_delicious.gif
< 1K
Download

 

storytools_digg.gif
< 1K
Download

 

storytools_facebook.gif
< 1K
Download

 

storytools_reddit.gif
< 1K
Download

 

storytools_rss.gif
< 1K
Download

 

storytools_print.gif
< 1K
Download

 

storytools_email.gif
< 1K
Download

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comment (1)

M I`5,Persecutio n Be rnard Lev in expresse s hi s vi ews

The article of which part is reproduced below was penned by Bernard. Levin
for the Features section of the Times. on 21 September 1991. To my mind, it
described the. situation at the time and in particular a recent meeting with
a friend, during which I for the first time admitted to someone other. than
my GP. that I had been subjected to a conspiracy of harassment over the
previous. year and a half.

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -

>There is a madman running loose. about London, called David Campbell; I have
>no reason to believe that he is. violent, but he should certainly be
>approached with caution. You may know him by the curious glitter in. his
>eyes and. a persistent trembling of his hands; if that does not suffice, you
>will find him attempting to thrust no fewer than 48 books. into your arms,
>all hardbacks, with. a promise that, if you should return to the same
>meeting-place next. year, he will heave another 80 at you.

>If, by now, the police. have arrived and are keeping a close watch on him,
>you may. feel sufficiently emboldened to examine the books. The jackets are
>a model of uncluttered typography, elegantly and simply laid. out; there is
>an unobtrusive colophon of. a rising sun, probably not picked at random.
>Gaining confidence – the lunatic. is smiling by now, and the policemen, who
>know about such things, have significantly removed their. helmets – you
>could do worse than take the jacket off the first book. in the pile. The
>only word possible to. describe the binding is sumptuous; real cloth in a
>glorious shade of dark green,. with the title and author in black and gold
>on the. spine.

>Look at. it more closely; your eyes do not deceive you – it truly does have
>real top-bands. and tail-bands, in yellow, and, for good measure, a silk
>marker ribbon in a lighter green.. The paper is cream-wove and acid-free,
>and the. book is sewn, not glued.

>Throughout. the encounter, I should have mentioned, our loony has been
>chattering away, although what he is trying to. say is almost impossible to
>understand; after a time, however,. he becomes sufficiently coherent to make
>clear that he is. trying to sell the books to you. Well, now, such quality
>in bookmaking. today can only be for collectors’ limited editions at a
>fearsome price -. #30, #40, #50?

>No, no,. he says, the glitter more powerful than ever and the trembling of
>his hands rapidly spreading throughout his. entire body; no, no – the books
>are priced variously. at #7, #8 or #9, with the top price #12.

>At this, the policemen understandably put their helmets back on; one. of
>them draws his truncheon and the other can be. heard summoning
>reinforcements on his walkie-talkie. The madman bursts. into tears, and
>swears it is. all true.

>And it. is.

>David Campbell has acquired the entire rights to the whole of. the
>Everyman’s Library, which died a lingering and shameful death a. decade or
>so ago, and he proposes to start it all. over again – 48 volumes this
>September and 80 more. next year, in editions I have described, at the
>prices. specified. He proposes to launch his amazing venture simultaneously
>in Britain and the United. States, with the massive firepower of Random
>Century at his back in this country, and the dashing cavalry. of Knopf
>across the water, and no one who loves. literature and courage will forbear
>to. cheer.

At. the time this article was written I had believed for some time that
columnists in the Times and. other journalists had been making references to
my situation.. Nothing unusual about this you may think, plenty of people
have. the same sort of ideas and obviously the papers aren’t writing about
them, so why should my beliefs not be as false as those of. others?

What makes this article so extraordinary. is that three or four days
immediately preceding its publication, I had. a meeting with a friend,
during the course of which we discussed the media persecution, and. in
particular that by Times columnists. It. seemed to me, reading the article
by Levin in. Saturday’s paper, that he was describing in some detail his
"artist’s impression" of that meeting. Most. telling are the final
sentences, when he writes, "The. madman bursts into tears, and swears it is
all true. And. it is." Although I did not "burst into tears" (he seems to be
using. a bit of poetic licence and exaggerating) I did try hard to convince
my friend that it was all. true; and I am able to concur with Mr Levin,
because,. of course, it is.

At the beginning of the piece Levin reveals a fear of being attacked by. the
"irrational" subject of his story, saying "I have no reason to. believe that
he is violent, but he should. certainly be approached with caution". This
goes back to the xenophobic propaganda of "defence" against. a "threat"
which was seen at the very beginning. of the harassment. The impression of a
"madman running loose" who needs to be. controlled through an agency which
assigns to itself the mantle of the "police" is also one which. had been
expressed. elsewhere.

In the final paragraph. of this extract, his reference to Everyman’s Library
as having "died. a lingering and shameful death a decade or so ago" shows
clearly what sort of conclusion they wish to their campaign. They want. a
permanent solution, and as they are prevented from achieving. that solution
directly, they waste significant resources on. methods which have been
repeatedly shown to be ineffective for such. a purpose.

292

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have No Comments

M I.5 Persecuti on , why won't th e Briti sh p olice do th eir jo b a nd pu t a st op to i t?

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-= why won’t the British police do their. job and put a stop to it? -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

The British police obviously do know what is. taking place. Besides my
interpretations of. what individual officers have said which forces that
conclusion,. it would be inconceivable for them to be unaware of something
on this. scale.

If they know, then they. will know that the abusers have broken laws in the
UK and abroad. Recently the UK introduced laws against electronic. spying
which carry a penalty of several years jail if caught. If the police. know
illegal harassment is taking place, and do nothing. about it, then they are
failing in. their responsibilities.

Last Easter (1995) I went into the local. police station in London and spoke
to an officer about the harassment against me.. But I couldn’t provide
tangible evidence; what. people said, in many cases years ago, is beyond
proof, and without something to support my statements I cannot expect. a
police officer to take the complaint. seriously.

The current situation with regard to the. police is not one which allows a
breakthrough in dealing with the problem. On the one hand, most. individual
officers at a local police station may not know. about the ongoing assaults,
so a complaint at that level will not yield results. Yet the police as. an
organisation do know of the harassment, and they must be aware. that a
complaint has. been made at a police station. So it is clearly their duty to
take preventative action against the. continuing molestation, but because
the. criminals are operating on behalf of a state agency, the police are not
carrying out their. duty.

2722

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have No Comments

M,I`5,Per secution , w hy won' t th e Brit ish p olice do thei r j ob and pu t a stop to it?

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-= why won’t the British police. do their job and put a stop to it? -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

The British police obviously do. know what is taking place. Besides my
interpretations of what individual. officers have said which forces that
conclusion,. it would be inconceivable for them to be unaware of something
on this. scale.

If they know, then they will know that the abusers have broken laws. in the
UK and abroad. Recently the UK. introduced laws against electronic spying
which carry a penalty of several years jail if caught.. If the police know
illegal harassment is taking place, and. do nothing about it, then they are
failing in their. responsibilities.

Last Easter (1995) I went into the local police station in. London and spoke
to an officer about. the harassment against me. But I couldn’t provide
tangible evidence; what people said, in. many cases years ago, is beyond
proof, and without. something to support my statements I cannot expect a
police officer to take. the complaint seriously.

The current situation with regard to the police is. not one which allows a
breakthrough in dealing with the problem. On the one. hand, most individual
officers at a. local police station may not know about the ongoing assaults,
so a complaint at that level. will not yield results. Yet the police as an
organisation do know of the harassment, and they must. be aware that a
complaint has been made at a police station. So it is clearly. their duty to
take preventative action against the continuing molestation,. but because
the criminals are operating on. behalf of a state agency, the police are not
carrying. out their duty.

292

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have No Comments

M'I`5 Perse cution ' wh y won 't t he Brit ish pol ice do t heir j ob a nd pu t a st op to it ?

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-= why won’t the British police do. their job and put a stop to it? -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

The. British police obviously do know what is taking place. Besides my
interpretations. of what individual officers have said which forces that
conclusion, it would be inconceivable for them to be. unaware of something
on this. scale.

If they know, then they will know that the. abusers have broken laws in the
UK and abroad. Recently. the UK introduced laws against electronic spying
which carry a penalty of several years jail if caught. If the. police know
illegal harassment is taking place, and do nothing. about it, then they are
failing in their. responsibilities.

Last. Easter (1995) I went into the local police station in London and spoke
to an officer about. the harassment against me. But I couldn’t provide
tangible evidence; what people said, in many cases years. ago, is beyond
proof, and without something to support my statements. I cannot expect a
police officer. to take the complaint seriously.

The current situation with regard to the police is not. one which allows a
breakthrough in dealing with the problem.. On the one hand, most individual
officers. at a local police station may not know about the ongoing assaults,
so a. complaint at that level will not yield results. Yet the police as an
organisation do know of the harassment, and. they must be aware that a
complaint has been made at a police station. So it. is clearly their duty to
take. preventative action against the continuing molestation, but because
the criminals are operating on behalf of a state agency,. the police are not
carrying out their. duty.

292

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have No Comments

M-I 5-Persec ution ` ab use in set -up situ ations an d in pu blic

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=–=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-= abuse in. set-up situations and in public -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=–=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Strangers in the street have recognized me on sight many times, and. shown
awareness of the current thread of abuse. To. give you one example, in 1992
I was seriously ill, and a. manager at work somewhat humorously said that
"it wasn’t fair" that people were bullying me. A. few days later, I attended
for the first time a clinic in London as an outpatient, and on. my way out
was. accosted by someone who asked if "they had paid my fare", with emphasis
on the word "fare". He repeated. the word several times in this different
context; that they should. have paid my "fare", each time emphasizing the
word.

For two and a half years from the time their harassment started. until
November. 1992 I refused to see a psychiatrist, because I reasoned that I
was not. ill of my own action or fault, but through the stress caused by
harassment, and that. a lessening of the illness would have to be consequent
to a removal of its immediate cause, in. other words a cessation of
harassment. I also reasoned that. since they were taunting me with jokes
about mental. illness, if I were to seek treatment then the abusers would
think that they. had "won" and been proved "right". Remember, the constant
theme of any persecution is, "we must destroy. you because you’re X",
whether X is a racial or other attribute. In this case. the X was "we
persecute you because you have brain disease". The similarity. of this logic
to Nazi attitudes to the mentally ill. is striking.

The same manager who’d said "it wasn’t fair" asked me in winter. 1992 why I
didn’t seek help from a psychiatrist; was it, he. asked, because "they would
think they. had won" if I sought treatment? That was something I’d never
said at work…. again, taken separately it proves nothing, but many such
things over a period of months proves conclusively that people in. the
company. knew what was going on, and in quite a lot of detail.

Usually harassment in public lacks the level of finesse of. "paying your
fare". Most people’s imagination does not go beyond moronic. parroting of
the current term of. denigration. That is not surprising given the average
level of the abusers; if. they do not have the intelligence to distinguish
wrong from right. then neither will they have the capacity for anything
other than mindless repetition of a monosyllabic. term calculated to fit
into their. minds.

The first incidents of verbal assault in public were in again in the. summer
of 1990, although they increased in. frequency and venom with time. In July
1990 the first public incident occurred on. a tube train on the Northern
line. Two men and their girlfriends recognised me;. the women sprang to my
defence,. saying "He looks perfectly normal, he doesn’t look ill". Their
boyfriends of. course knew better, and followed the party line; one of them
made reference to an "operation", apparently to work at the tube. station
but implicitly to a visit that I had made to hospital a. couple of weeks
previously.

In August 1990 going home from college, soon after getting on. a tube train
at Gloucester Road I was followed by a group of. four youths, who started a
chant of abuse. That they were targeting. me was confirmed by other people
in the carriage, one of whom asked the other. "who are they going on at, is
it the bloke who just got on?" to which the second. replied "yes, I think
so". I was tempted to reply, but as in every other instance. the abusers are
enabled in their cowardice by physically outnumbering. the abused; any
confrontation would result in my being beaten up,. followed by a complaint
to the police that "he attacked us", and of course he’s. ill, so he must
have been imagining that we were. getting at him. Shitty, aren’t they?

But the shittiness of the. four youths on the tube train is as nothing
compared to the episode on the National Express. coach to Dover in the
summer of 1992. While going on holiday to the Continent. I was verbally set
upon by. a couple travelling sitting a few rows behind. The boy did the
talking, his female companion. contributing only a continuous empty giggling
noise. He spoke loudly to ensure other people on the coach heard,. always
about "they" and "this bloke" but never naming either. the abusers or the
person he was talking about. He said "they" had "found. somebody from his
school, and he was always really stressed. at school". They must have dug
deep to find enemies there; perhaps someone who dropped. out of school,
someone who didn’t. do too well later, who was jealous and keen to get their
own back? The boy also said "he was in a bed and breakfast. for only one
night and they got him". By a not unexpected coincidence I had been. in a
B&B in Oxford a week previously, which had. been booked from work; other
things. lead me to the conclusion that the company’s offices were bugged for
most of the 2 1/2 years that I was there,. so "they" would have known a room
in the B&B. had been booked. (But I’ll bet "they" didn’t tell the company’s
managers their. offices were bugged, did they?).

After a few minutes of this I went back. to where they were sitting and
asked where they were travelling. The. boy named a village in France, and
the girl’s giggling suddenly ceased; presumably it. permeated to her brain
cell what the purpose. of the boy’s abuse was.

This and other set-up situations are obviously calculated to. provoke a
direct confrontation which would bring in. the police, with the abusers
claiming that they were the ones attacked.. Again in 1992, outside the
house where I was living in Oxford I was physically attacked. by someone –
not punched, just. grabbed by the coat, with some verbals thrown in for good
measure. That was something the people at work shouldn’t have. known
about… but soon after a couple of people were. talking right in front of
me about, "I heard he was attacked". The. UK police have a responsibility
for. preventing assault occurring, but they do not seem to take any interest
in meeting that responsibility. I suppose their attitude is that. harassment
does not come within their remit unless it involves. physical assault, and
they will only become involved once that happens. That is of course. quite
the wrong attitude for them to take, but as I now. understand, the police
investigate only. the crime they wish to investigate; if they do not take
your complaints seriously then there is nothing. you can do to make them
take. action.

2722

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comments (4)

M I-5'Persecuti on pu rpose in publicizin g it ; ce nsorship in uk. * ne wsgroups

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-= purpose in publicizing. it; censorship in uk.* newsgroups -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

The postings to uk.misc newsgroup generated a very. defensive reaction from
Usenet readers in the UK. So much so, that they tried. strenuously to
suppress what was being said, both by breaking. the rules of netiquette in
their responses on the forum, and directly by action. to revoke the account
from which the postings. were issued.

Yet the postings were within the normal. boundaries of behaviour for
uk.misc, and other less partisan spectators did not see justice in. the
censorship which was effected, as. the following excerpt shows;

:Karen Lofstrom. (lofst…@lava.net) wrote
:>It does seem. that the frequency and the size of his posts are
:>approaching net. abuse.  However, IMHO, they aren’t quite there yet. If
:>his postmaster were to act in this instance, it would. raise troubling
:>censorship. issues.

The inescapable conclusion. of the censorship effected on the uk.*
newsgroups is that the British are. intent on their wrongdoing remaining
concealed, and therefore seek to subvert and suppress freedom. of speech,
not only in their own country. where the media shows xenophobic bias and
bile against all perceived enemies within. and without, but also in other
countries which have their own statutes to guarantee. the basic human right
of. free speech.

It is absolutely necessary to bring. their hate campaign out into the open
where it can be placed under scrutiny and the. harassers seen for what they
are. That is the only way. of making it impossible for the security services
to carry it out. There. is a wider dimension, though. Xenophobia as
demonstrated by British people and institutions over the last few. years
belongs to the same stable as racial hatred. In one case,. two youths on a
Tube train made that. racism explicit by referring to their victim as a
"soft toy, not up to British Standards". Doubtless others. victimize partly
on the basis of race (isn’t it odd that they chose to torment someone. who
is not ethnically English?) while expressing their. abuse in terms of
another genetic attribute, namely mental illness. All. xenophobia on a
genetic basis is wrong,. but while racial insults are illegal, abusing the
mentally ill is neither against the law nor subject to similar. condemnation
when it. is exposed.

5152

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have No Comments

M,I`5 Persecut ion ' my respo nse to the har assment

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-= my response to the harassment. -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

My first reaction in 1990/91. was to assume that if I broke contact then
they would not be able to. follow and would lose interest. So I did the
things that have been suggested by other people; I sold. my television,
stopped listening to the. radio and tried to withdraw away from the sources
of abuse as much as possible. I reasoned that they must have more. important
things to deal with and that normal people would simply. leave me alone if
it were made difficult for them to continue their. harassment.

I reckoned. without the sheer vindictiveness of the abusers. They did not
let up but instead "got to" people around me,. mainly people at work, to do
their dirty work for them. I went to. see my GP, who refused to believe what
he was. being told, and refused to direct me on to anyone who could be of
practical assistance. It was not until three years. had passed that the GP
admitted the matter was outside. his competence and suggested going to the
police.

In the summer of 1994 we called in counter-surveillance experts from. a
private detective agency. to sweep our house and telephone for bugging
devices. They conducted a thorough search and found nothing; but. as noted
above,. since the existence of surveillance was being forced in my face by
the harassers,. you would expect them to have taken the possibility of a
counter-surveillance sweep into account when planning. the type of devices
to be. employed.

In Easter 1995 I made a complaint to my local Police. station in London, but
the police have not expressed any. intention to do anything about the
continuing harassment ("we’re not. saying it’s happening and we’re not
saying it isn’t happening" were the words used).. I think the officer I
spoke to at Easter wasn’t. aware of it happening, although other members of
the police. force obviously do know.

From April 1995 until the present time the matter has been. discussed in a
lot of. detail on the Usenet (Internet) "uk.misc" newsgroup. That discussion
has given birth to the article which you are now reading.. My hopes in
posting to Usenet were. that wider publicizing would discourage the security
services. from continuing their harassment, and "draw people out" into
concurring with the truth of what was being said. Neither of those. have
followed,. but the discussion has served a purpose in allowing this
structured report. to be created.

7582

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have No Comments